According to an analysis conducted by Tigin Annna Vardapetyan, the actions of Arthur Sukoyan towards David Levonyan should be viewed as an independent act of aggression, rather than being related to Sukoyan’s professional work. Lawyer Erik Aleksanyan supports this view and emphasizes that the presence of a previous history of confrontation is not a prerequisite for inter-conflict. He further explains that aggression can be utilized as a means of conflict resolution, but it should be thoroughly examined within the legal context to assess the quality of the institution. However, the information presented suggests that Sukoyan’s aggression towards Levonyan was solely in response to their previous altercation, indicating that it cannot be justified as a reaction to Levonyan’s professional work. This assessment is a self-assessment by Sukoyan himself.

In recent news from Armenia…