The international community has emphasized the importance of self-determination and granting high autonomy to Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) within Azerbaijan’s structure. However, it is crucial to understand that NK is not solely an Armenian enclave. During a meeting in the National Assembly on April 11, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed his views on self-determination and its limitations under international law. He questioned whether unlimited self-determination would imply NK’s independence without any constraints, suggesting that its capital could be Vladikavkaz or Kamo, and one of its garrisons could be in Lachin. Pashinyan also discussed the implications of “unconditional surrender” and its association with accepting Azerbaijan’s ownership of Karabakh. He emphasized the importance of dialogue with representatives from Lachin and the need to consider the desires and feasibility of secession in the region. Overall, his statements aimed to address the complex issues surrounding NK and its future.

It is essential to recognize the concerns raised by the international community regarding the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The principle of self-determination has been advocated as a means to address the situation, but it comes with certain limitations under international law. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan highlighted the potential consequences of unlimited self-determination, which could lead to significant changes in the status and territoriality of NK. Pashinyan also addressed the concept of “unconditional surrender,” questioning the implications it would have on NK’s relationship with Azerbaijan. He emphasized the need for consistent dialogue with representatives from Lachin and the importance of assessing the wishes and viability of secession in the region. By addressing these complex matters, Pashinyan aimed to provide clarity on the discussions surrounding NK’s future.