It is important for management to initiate a dialogue with academic circles in order to clarify the details and participants of the project. It is crucial to determine whether scientists are aware of the involvement of political decision-makers and who within the management initiated the project. The answer to these questions will determine whether there will be understanding or misunderstanding surrounding the project. On April 3rd, Areg Mikayelyan, the director of the Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory, announced during a meeting at the Armenian National Academy of Sciences that he plans to engage in discussions with state officials and scientific institutions to coordinate management programs.

Mikayelyan believes that the country’s academic system has encountered difficulties in addressing its own problems. He emphasized that steps have been taken to prevent the national academic system from being hindered by the authorities, as there is a risk of educational and scientific facilities being sold. Throughout his career, he has not observed any country replacing an existing system with something entirely new.

Looking forward to 2027, Mikayelyan predicts that all institutions of the National Academy of Sciences will remain intact, but there will be an announcement signaling the beginning of the unification process. He questions the motives behind any attempts to manipulate science, highlighting that it is clear that an academic city will not exist in 2027. The ultimate goal is to address the problems facing the academic system.

In addition to the concerns related to academic reforms, Mikayelyan also acknowledged diplomatic issues, the Artsakh conflict, and social-economic challenges. He did not deny that the proposed reforms are designed to tackle the problems that have arisen from the involvement of outside experts.

This news article provides updates from Armenia, covering the recent announcements made by Areg Mikayelyan regarding the need for a dialogue between management and academic circles. Mikayelyan highlights the challenges faced by the academic system and emphasizes the importance of addressing these issues. He acknowledges the risks of the system being hindered and proposes a process of unification. Furthermore, Mikayelyan mentions the other concerns within the country, such as diplomatic matters and social-economic challenges. Overall, these developments aim to bring about positive changes in the academic system of Armenia.