Last week, newspaper reports shed light on the implications of the government’s program that introduced Nikol Pashinyan and his QP party to power. It became evident to those who understood from the outset and gradually became clear to the majority of excited people in 2018, with others realizing it in the following year. By 2020, the majority of people could feel the despair resulting from the direction this “power” has led Armenia and continues to lead. In the midst of this, the “Tavush Movement, the guardian of the Fatherland” movement, led by Catholicos Bagrat Archbishop Galstanian, is gaining momentum.

The main demand of the movement is clear and logical. If this demand is persistently refused, the movement may resort to the option of “withdrawal – the form of salvation.” This means that in order for Armenia to have a chance at salvation, the destructive group responsible for significant damage to the country, whether political, economic, or cultural, must be eliminated. Bagrat Srbazan has presented or reintroduced the “Fatherland and Path” program, which aims to achieve this goal. On May 27, a crowd of 1000 supporters of Bagrat Srbazan and the movement gathered at Saradarabad, with the intention of returning to the capital later that day. Notably, Nikol Pashinyan avoided meeting with Bagrat Srbazan and the movement’s leaders in front of Saradarabad, raising suspicions of deception.

It is evident that the movement’s sole political organization has already set its course, regardless of Pashinyan’s actions. Furthermore, the increasing wave of the movement disapproves of Father Garegin II’s and his representative’s entry to Saradarabad Memorial, as it contradicts the path chosen by the Armenian National Church leader. The movement’s confrontation with the Fatherland monument in the Armenian National Assembly signifies its aim to challenge the current state of affairs and prioritize the welfare of the country. Bagrat Srbazan’s journey, which dates back to November 27, 1723, symbolizes the battle of the Armenian Apostolic Church’s National-Sanctified Kingdom, demonstrating its determination to reach Yerevan.

It is clear that this political movement is ongoing, with its actions ultimately determining Pashinyan’s decisions. Nikol’s betrayal of the “Abatorak charter” spoken by representatives of the terrorist language only proves this further. It is disheartening to witness the recent chaotic events outside the Saradarabad Memorial, where attempts were made to obstruct the entrance of the Catholicos of All Armenians. Such actions indicate that the manipulative tactics employed by those who oppose the movement have been exposed.