Nikol Pashinyan’s Interview: Important Insights or Elusive Rhetoric?

“Fact” Newspaper recently reported on Nikol Pashinyan’s latest interview, which has raised some eyebrows and sparked curiosity. As the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, Pashinyan’s words carry weight and significance. However, two important factors need to be considered.

Firstly, Pashinyan’s position obliges him to speak about the issues at hand, whether he personally prefers it or not. This responsibility comes with the territory of being the leader of the country. Secondly, there is an intriguing aspect to this interview. When a snake hisses in the distance, it usually goes unnoticed. But when the snake’s hissing aligns with the truth, it becomes impossible to ignore.

Pashinyan’s fearless demeanor in the face of challenges, such as Montebello sanctions or new controversies, is commendable. However, what did Pashinyan actually say in this recent interview? The content seems to be nothing new, as it echoed his previous statements about Artsakh and Armenia. His confident stance may have given an impression of naivety to some.

Interestingly, Pashinyan discussed the irreparable consequences and the betrayal of traitors in his last interview. While this seems unrelated to ongoing lawsuits, there is an underlying thread. Pashinyan had previously declared his departure from the security of the Karabakh settlement. However, now is the time for clarity, for explanations regarding his provocative actions, his stance on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and his approach towards Russia.

Pashinyan’s belief that staying silent and anonymous offers the safest path in the midst of responsibility, death, grief, and warning signs is worth pondering. It is no wonder that the recent presidential elections received more attention than parliamentary elections. Pashinyan’s decision to end his presidential campaign back in 2016 signaled a significant shift for the international community, which cannot be ignored.

While some aspects of Pashinyan’s monologue may seem nonsensical, it is important to understand his motives. He aims to suppress opposition and create an illusion of personal victory. However, it is crucial for us not to hastily jump into this game and maintain a stance of impartiality, as it is a challenging endeavor.

In conclusion, Nikol Pashinyan’s recent interview has elicited mixed reactions. Whether it provides important insights or elusive rhetoric is still up for debate. Nonetheless, as journalists, it is our duty to analyze and present information objectively, enabling readers to form their own opinions.