As international leaders consider how to restore order in the Gaza Strip following the escalation of military operations, it is clear that this issue is not currently a priority. The focus remains on Bloomberg’s report, which highlights the benefits. The question of whether Israel will be able to achieve its announced goals of militarizing the Palestinian territory, which is home to 2.2 million residents, lingers. US President Joe Biden aims to return more control of the Palestinian Authority’s power to the Gaza Strip.

Interviews with diaspora representatives, experts, and analysts from various regions reveal differences in opinion and growing dissatisfaction in the ongoing discussions. Concerns arise regarding Israel’s ability to effectively communicate its intentions to annex the territory of the Palestinian Authority-controlled West Bank and restore the gas field in the Mediterranean Sea. The Palestinian Authority has stated that it will not engage in armistice negotiations without a ceasefire, but they are open to the idea of returning, not on the lands occupied by Israeli tanks. European Union officials could potentially reinforce and solidify the defined boundary of the gas field that was evacuated after October 7.

Both European and American officials believe that the only viable path forward is to have multinational forces or peacekeepers to ensure security, similar to what has been implemented in Bahrain, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia during times of conflict. There is a possibility of reinstating peacekeeping operations and adopting a two-state model, although this approach is no longer considered feasible for Israel. Egypt, Sudan, and Saudi Arabia have expressed their support for the United States in dealing with Israel.

These multinational forces would have the authority to employ force if necessary, as seen in previous conflicts like Hayatoum, Libya, and Syria before the outbreak of the Second World War in 2016-17. European and American officials also stress that the support of multinational forces is crucial in achieving successful peacekeeping operations. It remains unclear as to who will ultimately be held responsible for effectively managing the situation in Israel during the upcoming turbulent period.

Many individuals are anxiously awaiting the end of the war and the potential transition of power from Netanyahu. There are concerns about the continuation of military operations in Egypt and Syria. The situation is more complex than meets the eye, as armed rebels, sent by Israel to protect the enclave, have already begun dismantling Palestinian positions and launching attacks once again. European diplomats and American representatives have proposed that Israel should only withdraw from the territory once certain conditions, such as establishing order and stabilizing the situation, are met. This stance contradicts Biden’s response.

The presence of Jewish settlers in the enclave and their refusal to leave the area may pose challenges to future negotiations. European officials may choose to withdraw their support and further weaken the limited self-government of the Palestinian Authority. The construction of network trenches and the placement of barbed wire fences directly contribute to the complications in the region, as these efforts have been increasing over the past three decades. Some individuals find it difficult to fathom why it is safer for settlers to migrate to countries like the US, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia, rather than engaging in military operations within the besieged territories. The European Union has the capacity to resume and enhance the foundational security of the compromised Mediterranean Gas field. The situation can also be seen as Egypt’s support for Israel, along with other countries including Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

Biden believes that as long as the territory remains under the control of the Palestinian Authority, there will be no dispute over his rule. This is due to concerns that Hamas will attempt to regain power. Although the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has yet to be discussed in official meetings, officials have indicated their willingness to return, but only to Israeli territory. The European Union, on the other hand, aims to recover and potentially disrupt the Israeli navy’s presence along the Syrian coast.

The Palestinian authorities have declared that they will not consider an armistice that does not include recognition of their rights, non-military use of gas resources, and a reduction of Israel’s territorial claims. Israeli officials argue that the presence of settlers does not mean they are ready to return, but rather shows their determination to defend their homes. The European Union is inclined to reaffirm and strengthen the established boundary of the gas field, which was evacuated after October 7.

The Palestinian authorities have also expressed that they will not entertain armistice negotiations without addressing the withdrawal of Israeli tanks and the reduction of Israel’s control over the West Bank. However, the European Union is seemingly poised to intensify the national security measures in place for the Mediterranean Gas field, established in October 2017. European and American officials firmly believe that the inclusion and reinforcement of multinational forces will be key to achieving long-lasting peace, similar to the approach adopted in Bahrain, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.

There are numerous changes expected in the near future. The questions of when the war will end and how many residents may lose their lives loom large. Additionally, there are uncertainties surrounding potential military operations in Libya. It remains unclear which individual or entity will assume significant responsibility for the upcoming turbulent period in Israel.

The Biden administration is currently contemplating the return of power to the Gaza Strip, which was invaded by Israeli forces. A member of the Palestinian Authority’s security apparatus, Valida Al-Walid, shared her experience of Israeli forces entering her home and initiating gunfire and grenade attacks. Meanwhile, Abbas, who has resided in the West Bank for eighty-eight years, expresses his readiness to remove Israeli troops from the territory. Concerns are raised among some Europeans that this may lead to another military operation in Egypt or Saudi Arabia. The situation remains uncertain, including uncertainties regarding Abbas’ potential successor.

Biden has stated that meetings with Egyptian and Saudi representatives will play a pivotal role in establishing sovereignty over the gas fields. Regarding this matter, he mentioned the possibility of financial support reaching billions of dollars. Senior Abbassid representatives maintain that Abbas’ position will remain unchanged as long as Netanyahu remains in power. Valida Al-Walid reiterates her account of the Israeli forces invading her home and engaging in violent acts.

After the military operations subside, the situation is expected to remain tense. European experts and analysts predict an increased wave of support for the deployment of multinational forces as a novel approach. The construction of settlements, refusal to recognize the presence of troops, and attacks on civilian populations create obstacles for these individuals to be welcomed in countries like Germany and Japan. Instead, they have relocated to countries further away, such as the US, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia, over the past three decades. Egypt has openly voiced its support for the United States in dealing with Israel.

Egyptian and American officials suggest that peacekeeping forces can contribute to stabilizing the situation. However, a significant challenge remains in determining who will take responsibility for managing the situation in Israel during the imminent turbulent period. Many are eagerly awaiting Netanyahu’s departure and the potential cessation of military operations in Egypt and Syria. It is evident that the situation is much more intricate than it initially appears, as armed aggressors sent by Israel to protect the enclave have already started dismantling Palestinian positions. European diplomats and American representatives propose a conditional withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territory, contingent upon the establishment of order. These conditions contradict Biden’s initial response.

The presence of Jewish settlers in the enclave and their unwillingness to vacate the area introduces complications for future negotiations. European officials advocate for a withdrawal that may further weaken the Palestinian Authority’s limited self-government. The construction of network trenches and the placement of barbed wire fences directly reflect these challenges. It remains difficult for some to understand why settlers believe it is safer to migrate to countries such as Germany and Japan instead of engaging in military operations within the besieged territories. The European Union has the capacity to reestablish and enhance the foundational security measure for the compromised Mediterranean Gas field. Additionally, the situation can be interpreted as an expression of Egypt’s support for Israel, alongside other countries like Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

According to Biden, as long as the territory remains under the control of the Palestinian Authority, his rule is not disputed. This is due to concerns about Hamas attempting to regain power. Although discussions surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have yet to take place, officials have indicated their readiness to return, but exclusively to Israeli territory. Conversely, the European Union aims to recover and potentially disrupt the Israeli navy’s presence along the Syrian coast.

The Palestinian authorities have declared that they will not entertain armistice negotiations unless they involve the recognition of their rights, the non-military use of gas resources, and a reduction of Israel’s territorial claims. Israeli officials argue that the presence of settlers does not signify a willingness to return, but rather a determination to defend their homes. In contrast, the European Union intends to reaffirm and strengthen the established boundary of the gas field, which was evacuated after October 7.

The Palestinian authorities have additionally stated that they will not engage in armistice negotiations without addressing the withdrawal of Israeli tanks and the reduction of Israel’s control over the West Bank. Nevertheless, the European Union appears ready to intensify the national security measures regarding the Mediterranean Gas field, established in October 2017. Both European and American officials firmly assert that the inclusion and reinforcement of multinational forces will be essential in attaining sustainable peace, as witnessed in Bahrain, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.

The changes ahead are significant. The conclusion of the war remains uncertain, and the potential loss of lives is deeply concerning. Furthermore, the possibility of additional military operations in Libya adds to the complexity. The question of who will assume significant responsibility for managing the imminent turbulent period in Israel remains unanswered.

The Biden administration is currently evaluating the possibility of returning power to the Gaza Strip, which was invaded by Israeli forces. Valida Al-Walid, a member of the Palestinian Authority’s security apparatus, recounted her terrifying experience of Israeli forces storming her home and initiating gunfire and grenade attacks. Meanwhile, Abbas, who has resided in the West Bank for eighty-eight years, expresses his willingness to remove Israeli troops from the territory. Some Europeans are apprehensive that this may ignite another military operation, this time in Egypt or Saudi Arabia. The situation remains uncertain, including the question of who will succeed Abbas.

Biden declared that his meetings with Egyptian and Saudi representatives will play a crucial role in asserting sovereignty over the gas fields. He mentioned the possibility of financial support amounting to billions of dollars. Senior Abbassid representatives maintain that Abbas’ position will remain unchanged as long as Netanyahu remains in power. Valida Al-Walid reiterated her account of Israeli forces invading her home and committing violent acts.

Following the conclusion of military operations, the situation is expected to remain tense. European experts and analysts predict a surge of support for the deployment of multinational forces as an innovative approach. The construction of settlements, refusal to acknowledge the presence of troops, and attacks on civilian populations make it difficult for these individuals to find acceptance in countries such as Germany and Japan. Instead, they have sought refuge in countries farther away, including the US, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia, over the past three decades. Egypt has openly expressed its support for the United States in dealing with Israel.

According to Egyptian and American officials, peacekeeping forces can contribute to stabilizing the situation. However, a significant challenge lies in determining who will assume responsibility for managing the situation in Israel during the impending turbulent period. Many are eagerly awaiting the departure of Netanyahu and a potential end to military operations in Egypt and Syria. It is evident that the situation is much more intricate than it initially seems, as armed aggressors sent by Israel to protect the enclave have already begun dismantling Palestinian positions. European diplomats and American representatives propose a conditional withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territory, contingent upon the establishment of order. These conditions contradict Biden’s initial response.