Aliev has announced that on September 11, the Armenian version of the “peace agreement” will be presented to Armenia, and global powers are eager to sign it. Vahé Hovhannisian, a member of the group “Alternative Projects,” raises some important questions in his article. He emphasizes the need for discussions about the agreement, including the involvement of judicial forces and experts from various fields. Hovhannisian also questions whether Nikol, the Armenian leader, has engaged in discussions with former presidents and international specialists. The article highlights the importance of inclusive decision-making when it comes to a treaty that affects the entire nation and its sovereignty.

On the other hand, Hovhannisian raises concerns about the level of interest in the agreement and its implications. He questions whether students are being encouraged to critically examine the agreement in their academic settings and whether scientific and academic communities are actively discussing the issue. Hovhannisian acknowledges the Church and international institutions for sounding the alarm about the agreement, but notes that this is not widely known.

The article also delves into the role of coincidence in determining the country’s development. It suggests that despite numerous campaigns and political efforts, there has been a failure to change the dynamics of the nation’s constant contradictions and confrontations. Hovhannisian questions whether this was due to an insurmountable problem or a lack of political will.

In the face of this abnormal situation, with a real opponent and genuine risks, the author suggests that unexpected elections may be one possible outcome. The article acknowledges the need for alternative developments and states that the “reality of not informing about anything real” cannot persist indefinitely. It emphasizes the urgency of finding a resolution and explores different possibilities.