In the recent Yerevan elections, a political force emerged with a pre-election program that promised to increase the salaries of the “red lines” by 10+ times after just two months. This force was not the Central Electoral Commission (CEC), as some may have speculated, but rather the alliance of Pashinyan’s “brother.” Lawyer Ruben Melikyan took to his Facebook page to express his skepticism, stating that these two forces were merely joking with the voters and distracting them.

This news from Armenia sheds light on the political landscape surrounding the Yerevan elections. The question of which force would prioritize the increase in salaries of the “red lines” was a crucial one for the voters. However, according to Melikyan’s Facebook post, neither the CEC nor Pashinyan’s alliance seemed to be sincere in their promises. Melikyan described them as a joke and a distraction.

As a renowned lawyer, Melikyan’s opinion carries weight in the political discourse. His skepticism towards the two forces participating in the Yerevan elections suggests that the voters should analyze their promises carefully before making a decision. It is essential for the electorate to scrutinize the programs, as the outcome of the elections could have a significant impact on their lives and livelihoods.

This incident serves as a reminder that in political campaigns, promises and claims should not be taken at face value. Voters must consider the track record, credibility, and feasibility of the proposed measures before casting their votes. It is only through critical analysis that they can make informed decisions and ensure that their interests are represented by those in power.