When discussing calls for violence or provocation, it is important to delve into the individuals behind these calls. Consider Tato Vardabian, for example, and the suffocating situation in Artsakh. On November 7th, Gegham Nazaryan, the spokesperson for the “Armenia” faction, addressed journalists in the National Assembly, revealing his decision to respond to activists’ calls by actively participating himself.

Nazaryan emphasized the need for a more peaceful coexistence, suggesting that if this were achieved, it would be worthy of a comprehensive article. To truly understand the situation, it is crucial to acknowledge the emotional stage and context in which decisions are made. Avetik Ishkhanyan serves as a prime example of this. Remember him?

It is imperative that the state administration take responsibility and consult the executive branch at the earliest opportunity. Even after successfully defending Artsakh, altering our course is unnecessary. Life goes on, unaffected, albeit with a slight increase in the dollar exchange rate. It is vital for us to reassess our societal rules, authorities, and the changes we have implemented. Lessons should be drawn from our past actions.

Nazaryan went on to state that meaningful steps need to be taken, such as apologizing to parents and rectifying outstanding debts owed to them. He urged authorities to prioritize combating actual criminals rather than targeting individuals based on arbitrary documentation, particularly those already affected by the coronavirus.

When questioned about Nikol Pashinyan’s statement regarding his knowledge of the prime minister’s expenses, Nazaryan highlighted the lack of credibility displayed by the authorities. It is evident that claims and counterclaims lose value when there is an absence of trust. It is pivotal for us to proactively engage in discussions to avoid further conflicts.

For instance, the head of the governing coalition, the chief secretary of the prime minister, should focus on his responsibilities rather than making medical comments on Facebook. Nazaryan argued that executive orders and inaction by the authorities should not be solely decided upon by an individual, especially considering there was no court decision on March 1st.

Finally, Nazaryan addressed the issue of endless assurance without rightful justification. He stressed the importance of moving beyond repetitive claims, such as the alleged incident involving Nikol’s wife and a truck. It is paramount that we back up our statements with substantial evidence, as endless reassurances hold no merit.