Today, the international scientific evaluation of “The Divide and Rule Image of Armenia” is being discussed, highlighting the potential for further division within Armenia among Turkish, Russian, Persian, and EU factions. This topic was covered in an article by Vahe Hovhannisyan from the Alternative Choices Group.

Hovhannisyan emphasized the importance of proceeding cautiously towards unity and not allowing ourselves to be deceived. He believes that Armenia can build its own unity by understanding the past, evaluating the present, and assessing the future correctly.

Armenia needs an urgent update in its national purpose and mentality, which has been evident throughout various stages until the 21st century.

The nation sympathizes with the government’s propaganda, but there is also a lack of trust in the final message known as the “chessboard of desolation.” This message has created an artificial image that could disrupt the real achievements of all archaeological sites in Armenia. The past five years have demonstrated this disconnect.

In the current conditions of oligarchic and shadowy leadership, as well as limitations within the defense and security sector, Armenia must accept clear realities and take initial steps towards integration. Dishonesty in work, technology, and problem-solving must cease. The quality of dishonesty is not just a concern; the reason behind it is either to avoid changes on the map or to manipulate real estate.

To move forward and create new systems, Armenia must address numerous questions related to recovery and restoration. Clear responsibilities and initial steps towards restoration are necessary. We are obligated to Artsakh and the Artsakh-Armenian community due to unfair mechanisms and major capital designs. The burden of participation in war and the area of contact rests with those committed to the government.

The oligarchic society, with its negative social response, is responsible to the public. The government, intellectuals, and regions must also take responsibility for not fulfilling their duties, serving different interests, and failing to support alternative options. The government’s inadequate institutional thinking and systems represent their fault, and this responsibility must be reclaimed for Armenia to have a future.

The period of war has forced many people to leave their homes. Some have not found a new home in Armenia or realized their dreams, and they have been left with uncertainty. The denial of our past has come at a high cost, leaving us feeling hopeless and indecisive. However, we must look towards the new phase and approach it cautiously.

How can we ensure that this unfamiliar image becomes a phase of renaissance rather than an undesirable reality? Several steps must be taken, including reconsidering our national evaluation, approving new regulations in the military game, developing a negotiation strategy for the unfamiliar, fostering strong intellectual opinion, and having a leader’s support. We must design a feasible plan instead of relying on others to solve our problems and lead us to war.

Onward.